All posts

AI Act Article 50: does your chatbot need to say it's AI? (since 2 August 2026)

· 5 min read · Robin Broers

Since 2 August 2026 your chatbot can be in breach of European law, and most business owners have missed it.

The reason: many small-business owners think the AI Act has been postponed to 2027 or 2028. That's true for a large part of the rules, but not for Article 50. That transparency duty applies now.

Just look at my own chatbot, in the bottom corner of this page: below the input field it clearly states that you're talking to an AI chatbot. That is exactly what the law now asks for.

What Article 50 means in plain language

The core is openness: people must always know when they're dealing with AI. Concretely, Article 50 (in force since 2 August 2026, source: artificialintelligenceact.eu) covers:

  • Direct interaction: if someone talks to a chatbot or AI assistant, that has to be clear (unless it's obvious).
  • Synthetic content: AI that generates text, images, audio or video must mark that output as AI-generated in a machine-detectable way.
  • Emotion recognition and biometrics: if you use such systems, you must inform the people involved.
  • Deepfakes and public information: deepfakes must be labelled as such. So must AI text on matters of public interest, unless a human has editorially reviewed the content.
  • Form and timing: the notice must be clear and visible at the first interaction at the latest, accessible to everyone.
  • Relation to other rules: this is separate from the requirements for high-risk AI (Chapter III).
  • Implementation: the AI Office supports codes of practice for detection and labelling.

In short: people must always know when they're talking to AI, or when content was artificially generated.

What such a notice can look like

The law doesn't prescribe a form, and a popup isn't needed. The difference is in the placement and how easy it is to find.

Infographic with four chat windows: an AI notice in the opening message or fixed below the input field works, a notice only after the first answer or only in the terms does not

What works:

  • An opening message from the bot.
  • A fixed line below the input field. It's there before someone types their first question, stays for the whole conversation, and is less intrusive.

What doesn't:

  • A block that only appears below the first answer. By then the first interaction has already happened, and paragraph 5 requires the notice at that moment at the latest.
  • A notice that only lives in the terms and conditions or on a separate explainer page.

Checklist: are you covered?

  • Does the first interaction state that it's AI, and not only after the first question?
  • Is that notice real text in the page, visible without hovering and readable by a screen reader?
  • Does it say on behalf of which organisation the AI speaks?
  • Is it clear how a visitor reaches a human when the answer isn't there?
  • Do you use generative AI for images, audio or video? Then the machine-readable marking comes on top, from 2 December 2026 for existing systems.
  • Do you know who in your organisation is accountable for this? That's part of the AI literacy duty (Article 4) that starts on the same day.

Three things that often get missed

1. The June postponement was not about this article. On 29 June 2026 the Council of the EU approved the Digital Omnibus, the first substantive amendment of the AI Act since 2024. It moved the obligations for standalone high-risk systems in Annex III to 2 December 2027, and AI embedded in regulated products in Annex I to 2 August 2028. Article 50 was not in that package, and the AI literacy duty in Article 4 stayed as well. If you read that the AI Act was postponed and concluded nothing is needed until 2027, you're looking at the wrong article.

2. The key dates at a glance.

  • 2 August 2026: transparency obligations (Article 50) and AI literacy (Article 4). National supervisors start enforcing.
  • 2 December 2026: machine-readable marking of AI-generated content (Article 50(2)) for systems already on the market before 2 August.
  • 2 December 2027: obligations for standalone high-risk systems in Annex III (moved by the Digital Omnibus).
  • 2 August 2028: AI embedded in regulated products in Annex I (also moved).

3. Compliance is a trust signal, not a burden. A chatbot that honestly says it's AI earns more trust and often converts better. You don't just comply with the law, you also show you do things properly.

Not sure whether your chatbot is covered?

I do a free AI Act check on your chatbot. Send me the link to your website and I'll check whether your notice meets Article 50 and where you're at risk. You get a short overview: what's right, what needs to change, and how to fix it. No costs, no obligations.

Request your free check via the contact form or mail robin@broersmarketing.com.

No chatbot yet? Then I'll build you one that does comply from day one.